Read our EU ETS response
Read our Innovation Fund response
Our main messages:
-
Simplify the EU ETS by phasing out free allocation
-
Aviation: put a seat belt on EUA supply
-
Free allocation: switch from process to products
-
Link indirect cost compensation to carbon-free electricity only
-
Reform the Innovation Fund to:
– Better assess the carbon footprint of electricity use
– Reserve grants to technology risk
– Reserve scale-up subsidies to poorly capitalised sectors -
Market Stability Reserve: reduce the reinjection rate as well as thresholds
-
Keep carbon removals out of the ETS
-
Do not shift CCU carbon accounting down value chains
-
Limit linking with other ETS
Read our responses on the European Commission’s website:
Related publications
May 25th 2023
More on the EU ETS and climate financing
A closer look at 2023 emissions: steelmaking caused a quarter of industry pollution
This brief analyses 2023 emissions under the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), using the latest data available from the EU Transaction Log (EUTL) . It particularly focuses on the iron and steel sector.
Feedback on the inclusion of permanent CCU in the EU ETS
Sandbag urges strict safeguards on permanent CCU within the EU ETS, calling for clear permanence standards, transparent product reviews, and faster removal of free allowances, while stressing CCU must complement (not replace) direct emission reductions.
Supply and demand in the EU ETS: It’s the hydrogen, stupid!
Learn about the supply and demand balance of the EU ETS through the end of its fourth phase in 2030, based on the latest market data and policy parameters. Are the results aligned with the EU’s target of a 55% reduction in emissions?
WHAT WE DO
TOOLS
PUBLICATIONS
NEWSLETTER
Mundo-b Matogné. Rue d’Edimbourg 26, Ixelles 1050 Belgium.
Sandbag is a not-for-profit (ASBL) organisation registered in Belgium under the number 0707.935.890.
EU transparency register no. 277895137794-73.
VAT: BE0707935890.