The European Commission has been running a public consultation and call for evidence on the design of the EU ETS and the Innovation Fund. Both are open until 8 July 2025. Questions include the treatment of aviation, shipping, indirect cost compensation, the CBAM, extension to municipal waste, carbon removals and carbon utilisation.
Our main messages:
-
Simplify the EU ETS by phasing out free allocation
-
Aviation: put a seat belt on EUA supply
-
Free allocation: switch from process to products
-
Link indirect cost compensation to carbon-free electricity only
-
Reform the Innovation Fund to:
– Better assess the carbon footprint of electricity use
– Reserve grants to technology risk
– Reserve scale-up subsidies to poorly capitalised sectors -
Market Stability Reserve: reduce the reinjection rate as well as thresholds
-
Keep carbon removals out of the ETS
-
Do not shift CCU carbon accounting down value chains
-
Limit linking with other ETS
Read our EU ETS response
Read our Innovation Fund response
8 July 2025
Read More:
State Aid for Indirect Carbon Costs: Reform before extending!
Sandbag responds to the EU’s consultation on State aid for Indirect Carbon Costs (ICC), calling for targeted reforms to better support clean electricity, avoid windfall profits, and align with the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).
Extending the CBAM to indirect emissions
Sandbag’s latest brief outlines why the CBAM must include indirect emissions — and how this would improve climate effectiveness, industrial fairness, and fiscal efficiency.
Simulating CDR in the EU ETS: The Risks of Premature Integration
The EU’s 2040 climate targets suggest integrating carbon removals into the ETS — but at what cost? This report uses Sandbag’s simulator to assess whether the risks of premature CDR integration outweigh the benefits.