The EU has around 286 million motor vehicles, and every year, 6.5 million of these are scrapped. If the steel scrap from these end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) is not managed well, valuable resources are lost, harming the environment.
With the EU preparing its ELV Regulation, which could set targets for minimum recycled steel content for passenger cars : what should those targets be?
About the policy brief
Despite a 90% overall steel recycling rate from ELVs, only 6% is reused for new car production. This analysis considers the environmental and safety challenges inherent in modern automotive steel design to propose a minimum recycled steel content target for passenger cars. It proposes clear and differentiated targets that could improve recycling practices in car production.
Key findings
Recycling targets should be specific for product categories rather than a single target for the whole car.
Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles and Electric Vehicles (EVs) use different amounts of long steel, which is easier to produce with high amounts of post-consumer scrap. Hence, a single target may have unintended consequences, such as increased fuel consumption.
Lightweighting strategies are important to consider.
High-Strength Steels (HSS) and Advanced High-Strength Steels (AHSS) enable vehicle structures that minimise the use of materials while maximising their strength and utility but have stringent quality requirements.
Limiting copper contamination is key to ease recycling.
The brief proposes solutions, including removing motors and electronics (e.g. sensors and wiring) during the dismantling phase before shredding.
Proposed targets can increase recycling.
The brief proposes differentiated targets: 5-10% post-consumer scrap for flat AHSS, 10-15% for flat carbon steel, and 70% for long AHSS.
To maximise circularity in car manufacturing, the quality requirements of each steel category should be considered, which requires separate targets for recycled steel material in passenger cars.
Read the full policy brief to learn more.
Photo by jplenio from pixabay
Related publications
Dec 1st 2025
May 26th 2025
More on the Industry
Chemicals and CCS/U: Exploring the role of carbon capture in the sector’s transition to ‘circularity’
This technical brief explores the potential role of carbon capture, storage and utilisation (CCS/U) for Europe's chemicals sector.
We find that CCS/U will be necessary in Europe’s chemicals sector, but only to a limited extent in targeted applications.
Steel labelling: Beyond the sliding scale
As EU policymakers debate how to certify low-carbon steel, Sandbag’s new briefing analyses the “sliding scale” method — and outlines why it may hinder rather than help decarbonisation. A new model is proposed based on product-specific benchmarks, multi-tier ratings, and circularity incentives.
Scrap Steel at Sea: How ship recycling can help decarbonise European steel production
As Europe seeks to decarbonise its steel industry, a new Sandbag report highlights an overlooked solution: high-quality scrap steel from retired ships. With up to 15 million tonnes of certified scrap available annually, ship recycling could meet 20% of EU steel scrap demand — if policy gaps are addressed.
Sandbag’s feedback to the call for evidence on the Circular Economy Act
Sandbag welcomes the Circular Economy Act (CEA) as an important step to accelerate the transition to a circular economy in the EU. Progress in this area has been slow and this act is sorely needed to address systemic issues holding back circularity, including the current fragmented approaches across Member States.
Electrification or electrical decarbonisation? We need both!
We agree with the European Commission’s general diagnosis that increasing the share of electricity in overall energy consumption is necessary to achieve deep decarbonisation. However, it is not sufficient. If overall energy use increases, or if electricity generation does not decarbonise rapidly, then electrification may fail its decarbonisation role.
Heat up industry, not the climate!
The European Commission has set out proposed terms and conditions for its auction on electrified /renewable industrial heat under the Innovation Fund (IF). We support the IF’s acknowledgment that indirect emissions are linked to the timing of electricity consumption rather than the source of electricity used. However, although it claims an intention to limit electricity use at hours of high marginal emission intensity, we are concerned that the proposed terms might lead to the opposite and significantly limit the scheme’s climate benefits.
Extending the CBAM to indirect emissions
The European Commission is considering amending the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to include indirect emissions of CO2 from the use of electricity in the manufacturing of CBAM-covered goods.
New Principles for Steel Labelling: response to the consultation on the Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act
Sandbag’s response to the EU’s Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act sets out four principles to guide green steel labelling schemes, promoting credible standards based on lifecycle emissions and system-wide decarbonisation.
Getting Electrification Right: The broader challenge of induced emissions
This report examines how the climate impact of electricity use is shaped not just by its source, but also by its timing and location. It evaluates the EU’s RED III framework and associated hydrogen targets, using the RFNBO standard as a case study. The analysis shows that ill-timed use of renewable electricity (particularly for hydrogen production) can inadvertently drive fossil generation. It argues for more strategic use of electricity to avoid these unintended consequences and support genuine decarbonisation.
Steel emissions standards under threat from flawed “mass balance” proposal
A joint letter from 30+ NGOs warns that coal-based steel could be falsely labelled as green under proposed “mass balance” rules. The signatories call for traceable, credible emissions data in steel standards.