Sandbag has co-signed a new open letter, alongside over 30 civil society organisations, warning against the inclusion of “mass balance” emissions accounting in international steel standards. The letter calls on standard-setters and corporate buyers to reject schemes that would allow emissions reductions from one part of a company’s operations to be arbitrarily reassigned to unrelated products — including coal-based steel.
The signatories highlight the risk that such methods could obscure the true emissions footprint of steel products, enable greenwashing, and undermine the credibility of climate-related product standards. They call for credible accounting rules grounded in physical traceability and full transparency.
About the open letter
The letter responds to proposals by the Japan Iron and Steel Federation (JISF) and Nippon Steel to embed “mass balance” accounting into global steel standards. These schemes would allow steelmakers to assign emissions cuts from one facility or process to other, unrelated products — even those made from coal-based production.
Key Findings
-
Mass balance enables misleading claims
Emissions cuts from one part of a company could be reassigned to unrelated products — including coal-based steel — regardless of actual production. -
No physical traceability
“Low-emissions” labels could be applied without any link to the site or process where reductions occurred. -
Undermines deep decarbonisation
Creates false parity between coal-based and genuinely low-emissions steel, weakening investment in clean technologies like H₂-DRI. -
Risk of greenwashing in standards
Embedding this method in PCFs or EPDs would obscure real emissions data and mislead buyers. -
Credible claims need clear rules
Low-emissions steel must be physically traceable, transparently reported, and third-party verified — not based on virtual reassignments.
Related publications
More on the Industry
Chemicals and CCS/U: Exploring the role of carbon capture in the sector’s transition to ‘circularity’
This technical brief explores the potential role of carbon capture, storage and utilisation (CCS/U) for Europe's chemicals sector.
We find that CCS/U will be necessary in Europe’s chemicals sector, but only to a limited extent in targeted applications.
Steel labelling: Beyond the sliding scale
As EU policymakers debate how to certify low-carbon steel, Sandbag’s new briefing analyses the “sliding scale” method — and outlines why it may hinder rather than help decarbonisation. A new model is proposed based on product-specific benchmarks, multi-tier ratings, and circularity incentives.
Scrap Steel at Sea: How ship recycling can help decarbonise European steel production
As Europe seeks to decarbonise its steel industry, a new Sandbag report highlights an overlooked solution: high-quality scrap steel from retired ships. With up to 15 million tonnes of certified scrap available annually, ship recycling could meet 20% of EU steel scrap demand — if policy gaps are addressed.
Sandbag’s feedback to the call for evidence on the Circular Economy Act
Sandbag welcomes the Circular Economy Act (CEA) as an important step to accelerate the transition to a circular economy in the EU. Progress in this area has been slow and this act is sorely needed to address systemic issues holding back circularity, including the current fragmented approaches across Member States.
Electrification or electrical decarbonisation? We need both!
We agree with the European Commission’s general diagnosis that increasing the share of electricity in overall energy consumption is necessary to achieve deep decarbonisation. However, it is not sufficient. If overall energy use increases, or if electricity generation does not decarbonise rapidly, then electrification may fail its decarbonisation role.
Heat up industry, not the climate!
The European Commission has set out proposed terms and conditions for its auction on electrified /renewable industrial heat under the Innovation Fund (IF). We support the IF’s acknowledgment that indirect emissions are linked to the timing of electricity consumption rather than the source of electricity used. However, although it claims an intention to limit electricity use at hours of high marginal emission intensity, we are concerned that the proposed terms might lead to the opposite and significantly limit the scheme’s climate benefits.
Extending the CBAM to indirect emissions
The European Commission is considering amending the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to include indirect emissions of CO2 from the use of electricity in the manufacturing of CBAM-covered goods.
New Principles for Steel Labelling: response to the consultation on the Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act
Sandbag’s response to the EU’s Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act sets out four principles to guide green steel labelling schemes, promoting credible standards based on lifecycle emissions and system-wide decarbonisation.
Getting Electrification Right: The broader challenge of induced emissions
This report examines how the climate impact of electricity use is shaped not just by its source, but also by its timing and location. It evaluates the EU’s RED III framework and associated hydrogen targets, using the RFNBO standard as a case study. The analysis shows that ill-timed use of renewable electricity (particularly for hydrogen production) can inadvertently drive fossil generation. It argues for more strategic use of electricity to avoid these unintended consequences and support genuine decarbonisation.
Joint statement urges EU to boost the use of recycled steel scrap in the automotive sector
A new joint statement urges the EU to set binding targets for recycled steel use in cars, citing the climate benefits of secondary steel and the need to reduce demand for high-emission imports.