The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) aims to ensure that imported goods face the same carbon costs as those produced in Europe.
As CBAM enters its next phase, the European Commission asked for input on three areas:
- Article 7 – Emissions reporting
- Article 31 – Adjustment to take account of free allocation
- Article 9 – Carbon prices paid in third countries
Sandbag responded to each consultation, highlighting risks that could weaken CBAM’s impact and offering practical solutions.
Our main recommendations
- Article 7 (Emissions reporting): Avoid resource shuffling by using induced emissions and systematic default values for steel, aluminium, cement, and electricity imports.
- Article 31 (adjustment for Free allocation): Move to product-based free allocation, ensuring equal treatment between EU and imported goods.
- Article 9 (Carbon price paid abroad): Ensure deductions only apply where carbon prices are paid for the production of goods, taking into account all support received by the production plant even not for carbon.
Related publications
Aug 6th 2025
Aug 1st 2025
Dec 13th 2024
More on the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
CBAM impact on US trade: an analysis
Sandbag’s September 2025 research note explores the impact of the EU’s CBAM on US exports. It finds that even with expanded scope, the financial impact remains marginal, and US carbon pricing could turn net costs negative.
The EU CBAM: A Two-Way Street to Climate Integrity?
Supported by the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Sandbag’s report examines the impact of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and the gradual removal of free allowances on third-country exporters. The joint implementation is expected to raise production costs for both EU and non-EU producers, leading to higher prices for CBAM-covered goods in the EU. Moreover, some exporters may reduce CBAM liabilities through resource shuffling, potentially increasing their profit margins.
Strengthening the CBAM — by default
The consultation aims to address concerns that the CBAM has loopholes that could distort competition between products manufactured in the EU (covered by the EU ETS) and imported goods. Our response sets out proposals for how the design of the CBAM could be improved in these regards.