The proposed FAR rewards steel plants using transformed virgin ores (hot metal and direct reduced iron) with free emission permits, but by doing so, penalises those using recycled scrap. This contradicts the political mandate that the Parliament and the Council gave to the Commission. The revised EU ETS Directive, clearly stated that free emission allowances should be distributed in a way that is “independent of the feedstock or the type of production process” (Recital 10), yet the draft legal act published yesterday by the Commission continues to discriminate between feedstocks in steelmaking.
The revision of the Free Allocation Regulation is the last chance to fix a system that continues to reward the most carbon-intensive steel production methods. The allocation method of free permits needs to –and still can – be fixed. We and the 12 other signatories of this joint letter call upon the co-legislators to react while there is still time, and ask the Commission to take our concerns into consideration as part of the ongoing public consultation. We hope to see this issue resolved in the final draft of the revised FAR.
A solution to fix the hot metal/DRI benchmark
Sandbag developed a proposal to improve the free allocation method. It only affects the hot metal/DRI benchmark proposed by the Commission and would not change, on average, the number of free allowances received by steel plants. We have submitted this proposal to the Expert Group on Climate Change Policy, tasked with advising the Commission on the revision of the FAR.
Read More:
Metallurgical flexibility: Enabling the aluminium and steel sectors for demand response
Electrification and flexibility are critical to decarbonising both industrial and electricity systems. But what happens when we combine the two? Industrial flexibility will play an increasingly important role as industry moves towards electrification.
A closer look at 2023 emissions: steelmaking caused a quarter of industry pollution
This brief analyses 2023 emissions under the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), using the latest data available from the EU Transaction Log (EUTL) . It particularly focuses on the iron and steel sector.
Steel and CCS/U: Decarbonisation potential, costs, and bottlenecks
Carbon capture, storage and/or utilisation (CCS/U) technologies are often touted as a ‘catch all’ solution for the decarbonisation of heavy industry, but their effectiveness and relevance vary widely across applications. This new report offers a comprehensive assessment of CCS/U technologies in the context of iron and steel manufacturing in Europe.