The European Commission has been running a public consultation and call for evidence on the design of the EU ETS and the Innovation Fund. Both are open until 8 July 2025. Questions include the treatment of aviation, shipping, indirect cost compensation, the CBAM, extension to municipal waste, carbon removals and carbon utilisation.
Our main messages:
-
Simplify the EU ETS by phasing out free allocation
-
Aviation: put a seat belt on EUA supply
-
Free allocation: switch from process to products
-
Link indirect cost compensation to carbon-free electricity only
-
Reform the Innovation Fund to:
– Better assess the carbon footprint of electricity use
– Reserve grants to technology risk
– Reserve scale-up subsidies to poorly capitalised sectors -
Market Stability Reserve: reduce the reinjection rate as well as thresholds
-
Keep carbon removals out of the ETS
-
Do not shift CCU carbon accounting down value chains
-
Limit linking with other ETS
Read our EU ETS response
Read our Innovation Fund response
8 July 2025
Read More:
Growing glut of carbon allowances threatens EU climate ambition
Poland gets best deal under past carbon targets, report finds
Aviation in the Emissions Trading Scheme: The impact of the 2012 ‘Stop the Clock’
The EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) initially covered CO2 emissions from all flights to and from EU airports. However, in 2012, facing significant opposition and threats of a trade war, the EU revised the scheme to include only intra-EU flights, a move known as “Stop the Clock.” What is the cost of this scheme? How can it effectively reduce aviation emissions in the future?