Industrial heat electrification is a key strategy for decarbonising energy-intensive industries by replacing fossil-based heat. We welcome the European Commission’s initiative to launch an auction to electrify industrial heat, while emphasising the need for careful design to prevent unintended increases in emissions due to electricity grid dynamics.
About the position paper
This position paper sets out our feedback on the proposed new €1 billion fixed-premium auction under the Innovation Fund, which is aimed at accelerating the decarbonisation of industrial process heat. We welcome the proposal and suggest how the auction can be designed to maximise emission reductions from the scheme.
Key findings
Industrial heat decarbonisation needs urgent support
The auction is a timely measure to help overcome current investment barriers and signal strong support for electrification technologies.
Emissions impact depends on marginal electricity generation
The net climate benefit of electrification depends significantly on the marginal generation source supplying the grid at the time of electricity use, with risks of increased emissions if fossil fuels are supplying the marginal demand.
Efficiency-based baskets improve auction effectiveness
Dividing auction projects by energy efficiency and applying tailored safeguards prevents incentives for high-emission operations and promotes genuine emissions reduction.
This new auction to promote the decarbonisation of key industrial processes is a welcome step. To maximise the impact of the industrial heat electrification auction and support the EU’s climate goals, we recommend that:
Robust safeguards are in place to avoid unintended emission increases caused by electricity grid dynamics.
Efficiency-based baskets are used to ensure that subsidies reward genuine emissions reductions.
Subsidy payments are limited during times when fossil-fuel power plants set the marginal electricity price.
The auction design strikes a balance between accelerating decarbonisation and maintaining grid stability.
With these measures, the auction can be a strong step towards a cleaner and more competitive industrial sector.
Read the full position paper to learn more.
Photo by rsaraiva from Canva
Related publications
Aug 11th 2025
More on the Climate Financing
Chemicals and CCS/U: Exploring the role of carbon capture in the sector’s transition to ‘circularity’
This technical brief explores the potential role of carbon capture, storage and utilisation (CCS/U) for Europe's chemicals sector.
We find that CCS/U will be necessary in Europe’s chemicals sector, but only to a limited extent in targeted applications.
Steel labelling: Beyond the sliding scale
As EU policymakers debate how to certify low-carbon steel, Sandbag’s new briefing analyses the “sliding scale” method — and outlines why it may hinder rather than help decarbonisation. A new model is proposed based on product-specific benchmarks, multi-tier ratings, and circularity incentives.
Scrap Steel at Sea: How ship recycling can help decarbonise European steel production
As Europe seeks to decarbonise its steel industry, a new Sandbag report highlights an overlooked solution: high-quality scrap steel from retired ships. With up to 15 million tonnes of certified scrap available annually, ship recycling could meet 20% of EU steel scrap demand — if policy gaps are addressed.
Sandbag’s feedback to the call for evidence on the Circular Economy Act
Sandbag welcomes the Circular Economy Act (CEA) as an important step to accelerate the transition to a circular economy in the EU. Progress in this area has been slow and this act is sorely needed to address systemic issues holding back circularity, including the current fragmented approaches across Member States.
Electrification or electrical decarbonisation? We need both!
We agree with the European Commission’s general diagnosis that increasing the share of electricity in overall energy consumption is necessary to achieve deep decarbonisation. However, it is not sufficient. If overall energy use increases, or if electricity generation does not decarbonise rapidly, then electrification may fail its decarbonisation role.
Heat up industry, not the climate!
The European Commission has set out proposed terms and conditions for its auction on electrified /renewable industrial heat under the Innovation Fund (IF). We support the IF’s acknowledgment that indirect emissions are linked to the timing of electricity consumption rather than the source of electricity used. However, although it claims an intention to limit electricity use at hours of high marginal emission intensity, we are concerned that the proposed terms might lead to the opposite and significantly limit the scheme’s climate benefits.
Extending the CBAM to indirect emissions
The European Commission is considering amending the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to include indirect emissions of CO2 from the use of electricity in the manufacturing of CBAM-covered goods.
New Principles for Steel Labelling: response to the consultation on the Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act
Sandbag’s response to the EU’s Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act sets out four principles to guide green steel labelling schemes, promoting credible standards based on lifecycle emissions and system-wide decarbonisation.
The EU ETS at a Crossroads
Sandbag’s latest submission to the EU ETS and Innovation Fund consultation calls for clearer rules on free allocation, stronger criteria for funding innovation, and safeguards against misleading carbon accounting practices.
Getting Electrification Right: The broader challenge of induced emissions
This report examines how the climate impact of electricity use is shaped not just by its source, but also by its timing and location. It evaluates the EU’s RED III framework and associated hydrogen targets, using the RFNBO standard as a case study. The analysis shows that ill-timed use of renewable electricity (particularly for hydrogen production) can inadvertently drive fossil generation. It argues for more strategic use of electricity to avoid these unintended consequences and support genuine decarbonisation.