Electrification and flexibility are critical to decarbonising both industrial and electricity systems.
But what happens when we combine the two?
Industrial flexibility will play an increasingly important role as industry moves towards electrification.
About the report
This report examines demand response as a key strategy for phasing out fossil fuels in electricity systems, especially as we integrate more intermittent renewables. If electricity supply cannot always meet demand, then demand will have to adapt – and large industrial consumers have a big role to play.
Challenges and opportunities of flexibility
Flexibility does not necessarily lead to a loss of production
- In primary aluminium smelting, the strong link between energy input and production, together with the physical constraints of the smelting process, limits the ability of these operators to fully engage in demand response. However, emerging retrofit technologies show promise in enabling these industries to provide regular and intense flexibility to the power grid.
- In contrast, hydrogen-based steelmaking offers immense flexibility potential. Unlike aluminium, where flexibility comes from adjusting energy inputs, steelmakers can balance feedstock between virgin iron and scrap. This allows them to shut down equipment completely and reduce their energy consumption by more than 80% for several hours each day, depending on the proportion of scrap used.
A necessity to adapt for industrial operators
Key takeaways
- To maximise renewables integration and cost-effectively upgrade grids, non-fossil flexibility instruments must replace traditional capacity mechanisms to reduce reliance on thermal power for balancing and ancillary services.
- Building flexibility into industrial processes requires new strategies, from oversizing machinery to storing excess production.
- Due to the wide variation in operating costs, efficiencies and profit margins between plants, fair compensation for demand response requires tailored bilateral negotiations with grid operators, as a one-size-fits-all approach is impractical.
- Industrial flexibility does not necessarily lead to lower production output.
- Investment in additional renewable capacity is critical to avoid overloading the grid and triggering thermal generation.
- Industry participation in demand response is only the first step towards a fully flexible, fossil-free electricity system.
Related publications
Feedback on the EU Commission’s draft methodology for low-carbon hydrogen
For ‘low carbon’ hydrogen to truly make a positive contribution to Europe’s transition to climate neutrality, the safeguards put in place must be meaningful. Unfortunately, this does not appear to be the case in this draft delegated act.
A closer look at 2023 emissions: steelmaking caused a quarter of industry pollution
This brief analyses 2023 emissions under the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), using the latest data available from the EU Transaction Log (EUTL) . It particularly focuses on the iron and steel sector.
Steel and CCS/U
Carbon capture, storage and/or utilisation (CCS/U) technologies are often touted as a ‘catch all’...