Building smarter climate policy

We analyse emissions data and research decarbonisation pathways to advocate evidence-based policies

We are a think tank conducting data-driven and evidence-based advocacy to improve EU climate policy.

Our topics

EU Emissions Trading System

We conduct research on the EU ETS to find concrete ways to reduce emissions and advocate for efficient carbon pricing mechanisms.



Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism

We support a strong CBAM to phase out the allocation of free emission allowances, address carbon leakage, and accelerate global climate action.



Industry

We explore the potential of electrification, circularity, and innovative technologies to decarbonise hard-to-abate sectors like steel, aluminium, and cement.



Climate Financing

We analyse EU funding initiatives driving climate innovation and industrial decarbonisation. Ensuring revenues from the EU ETS and CBAM are well spent.



Carbon Dioxide Removal

We conduct research on CDR to ensure those technologies are incentivised properly, and help – rather than hinder – the EU on its path to climate neutrality.

Our publications

We produce data-driven and evidence-based reports, briefs and policy recommendations on EU decarbonisation.

Towards a minimum recycled steel content in passenger cars: setting an initial target

Mar 13, 2025

The EU has around 286 million motor vehicles, and every year, 6.5 million of these are scrapped. If the steel scrap from these end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) is not managed well, valuable resources are lost, harming the environment. With the EU preparing its ELV Regulation, which could set targets for minimum recycled steel content for passenger cars : what should those targets be?

In or Out: What’s best for carbon removals and the EU ETS?

Dec 17, 2024

What will the future of the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) look like as the emissions cap heads towards zero? Is integrating carbon dioxide removals (CDRs) into the ETS a solution to help the EU achieve its climate goals? Or would they compromise the integrity and functioning of the system? These questions are at the forefront of the Commission’s mind as they review different options for the future of the ETS ahead of the 2026 revision.

For a systematic use of default values in the CBAM

Dec 16, 2024

The current carbon emissions reporting in the CBAM fails to achieve its goal of replacing free allocations under the EU ETS and undermines its integrity. A systematic default value system would improve the CBAM and safeguard the EU ETS.

Our data tools

Our in-house tools provide the insights needed to develop data-driven climate policies.

U

Carbon price viewer

Check and analyse the evolution of the EU carbon price over time.

Try now

U

EU ETS Dashboard

Explore sector-specific emissions data within the EU Emissions Trading System at various levels of granularity.

Try now

U

EU ETS Simulator

Analyse the impact of policy adjustments on the EU ETS.

Try now

U

Abatment curve

Evaluate when the shift from unabated fossil hydrogen to renewable hydrogen becomes cost-effective for sectors like refining, methanol, and ammonia.

Try now

Public Outreach

High level conference on the Clean Industrial Deal

On 21 February 2025, We joined a high-level conference at the Permanent Representation of France to the EU. We shared our expertise on a key pillar of industrial decarbonisation: the CBAM.

High-Level Conference on the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)

We joined experts from the European Commission, think tanks and industry to discuss possible evolutions of the CBAM in an event organised by France’s Direction Générale du Trésor.

High level conference on the Clean Industrial Deal

On 21 February 2025, We joined a high-level conference at the Permanent Representation of France to the EU. We shared our expertise on a key pillar of industrial decarbonisation: the CBAM.

Closing Loopholes: Making CBAM Work for Aluminium

We joined a high-level panel discussion at the European Parliament about a potential loophole for aluminium products – which could happen if emissions from aluminium scrap weren’t accounted for in the CBAM.

China International Import Expo

We presented at the China International Import Expo on “Recent Developments in the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM): Outlook after the Transitional Period.”

Want to stay updated about our activities?

Subscribe to our newsletter

Follow us on social media

Questions & answers

Why the name ‘Sandbag’?

Sandbag symbolises the coordinated action people take to protect themselves and others in the face of extreme weather events. Likewise, we work to unite stakeholders to protect the environment, society, and economy from the risks of ineffective climate action.

Are you a think tank or an NGO?

We are a think tank that produces research, tools, and evidence for decision-making. But we also actively advocate for change, making us an “advocacy think tank”.

How are you funded?

Our work is supported by foundation grants and individual donations from those who share our commitment to advancing effective climate policies. We also occasionally undertake consultancy work that aligns with our mission to drive efficient emissions reductions. For instance, supporters have included the European Climate Foundation, the European Commission, Energy Foundation China, KR Foundation, WWF, Climate Action Network Europe, and Environmental Defense Fund Europe.

What is your legal statute?

We are a Belgian not-for-profit organisation (Association Sans But Lucratif – ASBL). Any financial surplus is reinvested into Sandbag. Our registration number is 0707.935.890.