Hydrogen is seen as central to the green transition, but overreliance on ‘green’ hydrogen could hinder Europe’s climate goals by diverting renewable energy from grid decarbonisation. What are the risks of high Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin (RNFBO) deployment, and how could it impact the EU’s decarbonisation strategy?
About the report
The EU’s amended Renewable Energy Directive (RED III) targets an increase in the share of renewables from 24.5% in 2023 to 42.5% by 2030, with ambitious sectoral sub-targets for RFNBO use in industry and transport. However, without stringent regulation, RFNBO deployment could cause emissions to flatline rather than decrease.
The report models different scenarios to assess the impact of hydrogen production on the electricity grid, quantifying ‘induced’ emissions associated with RNFBO production and comparing RFNBO use with alternatives like direct electrification or the displacement of fossil fuel-based electricity in the grid.
It shows that while producing hydrogen with a low carbon footprint is possible, when induced emissions are counted, the carbon footprint of RFNBOs can be very high.
Key findings
Hydrogen production can increase emissions
RFNBO production could generate more emissions than fossil-based hydrogen as it tends to divert renewables from decarbonising the grid.
In a highly interconnected EU grid, these ‘induced’ emissions could be even higher.
Direct electrification is more efficient
Electrifiying sectors such as transport is much more energy-efficient than relying on RFNBOs and should be prioritised where possible.
Hydrogen should be used strategically
RFNBOs should be prioritised for industries that already depend on fossil-fuel hydrogen, like ammonia and methanol production.
Policy adjustments are needed
Revise RED sub-targets to encourage energy-efficient solutions such as electrification more than hydrogen use.
Better emissions accounting in the RFNBO standard, to account for induced emissions.
Revised RFNBO standard to only make eligible hydrogen produced without induced emissions.
Related publications
Sandbag’s feedback to the call for evidence on the Circular Economy Act
Sandbag welcomes the Circular Economy Act (CEA) as an important step to accelerate the transition to a circular economy in the EU. Progress in this area has been slow and this act is sorely needed to address systemic issues holding back circularity, including the current fragmented approaches across Member States.
Electrification or electrical decarbonisation? We need both!
We agree with the European Commission’s general diagnosis that increasing the share of electricity in overall energy consumption is necessary to achieve deep decarbonisation. However, it is not sufficient. If overall energy use increases, or if electricity generation does not decarbonise rapidly, then electrification may fail its decarbonisation role.
Heat up industry, not the climate!
The European Commission has set out proposed terms and conditions for its auction on electrified /renewable industrial heat under the Innovation Fund (IF). We support the IF’s acknowledgment that indirect emissions are linked to the timing of electricity consumption rather than the source of electricity used. However, although it claims an intention to limit electricity use at hours of high marginal emission intensity, we are concerned that the proposed terms might lead to the opposite and significantly limit the scheme’s climate benefits.
Mundo Matogné. Rue d’Edimbourg 26, Ixelles 1050 Belgium. Sandbag is a not-for-profit (ASBL) organisation registered in Belgium under the number 0707.935.890. EU transparancy register no. 277895137794-73. VAT: BE277895137794-73